Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Council Online Planning - Decision Notice Summary

Planning Application Number: RB2025/0870
Site Address: 24 Reresby Road Whiston 0024
Description: Two storey front & side and single storey side/rear extension
Officer Recommendation: REFUSED
Officer Recommendation Date: 11 November 2025
Decision Date: 12 November 2025
Decision Type: REFUSED
Temporary Expiry Date:
Decision Level/Committee: Delegated (Part 2A)
Conditions / Reason for Refusal: 01 The Council considers that the proposed two storey front extension by virtue of its size, design, location and projection would not represent a subservient addition to the host property and would appear unduly prominent. The proposed extensions would create a scheme that would not be subservient to the host property and would create an incongruous feature which is highly visible within the street scene therefore, being harmful to the character and appearance of the host property and the streetscene in general. As such the development is contrary to Local Plan Policies CS28 ‘Sustainable Development’ and SP55 ‘Design Principles’, as well as the Council’s SPD ‘Householder Design Guide’ and the guidance in the National Planning Policy Framework and the National Planning Practice Guidance. 02 The two-storey front extension and the proximity to the shared boundary has the potential to unduly impact on the residential amenity of the neighbouring occupiers No. 22 Reresby Road and is therefore contrary to the NPPF, policies CS28 ‘Sustainable Design’ and SP55 ‘Design Principles’ of the Local Plan and the adopted Supplementary Planning Document - ‘Householder Design Guide’. Positive and Proactive Statement The applicant did not enter into any pre application discussions with the Local Planning Authority. Whilst discussions during the determination of the application have identified a possible acceptable alternative to this proposal, the applicant has been unwilling to amend the scheme. This was not considered to be in accordance with the principles of the National Planning Policy Framework and resulted in this refusal.

Click here to return to: Welcome Screen Search Screen Search Results Details Screen