Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Council Online Planning - Decision Notice Summary

Planning Application Number: RB2019/1686
Site Address: Vicarage Christchurch Road Wath-upon-Dearne 9999
Description: Application to undertake works to a tree(s) protected by RMBC TPO No. 10, 1975
Officer Recommendation: PART GRANT PART REFUSED
Officer Recommendation Date: 16 December 2019
Decision Date: 17 December 2019
Decision Type: PART GRANT PART REFUSED
Temporary Expiry Date:
Decision Level/Committee: Delegated (Part 2A)
Conditions / Reason for Refusal: Consented Works: ? G21 There is no objection to the proposed work that has been submitted in the application. The pruning of the Lime tree will reduce the stress/weight that the tight union is currently being subjected to, therefore reducing the likely hood of full or partial failure. The removal of the Sycamore will prevent possible future damage occurring to the boundary wall. Its removal will not have a significant impact on the amenity of the area. ? T22 There is no objection to the proposed work that has been submitted in the application; the work is appropriate to the long-term management of the tree and will not affect the amenity it provides. ? T25 There is no objection to the proposed work that has been submitted in the application; the work is appropriate to the long-term management of the tree and will not affect the amenity it provides. ? T26 There is no objection to the proposed work. The tree has significant amounts of die back within its crown with pockets of decay on the main stem. Fungal fruiting bodies are also present on the main stem of the tree, increasing the possibility of structural weakness and full or partial failure. ? T27 There is no objection to the proposed work that has been submitted in the application; the work is appropriate to the long-term management of the tree and will not affect the amenity it provides. Refused Works: ? T28 The work applied for would constitute the removal of a significant amount of canopy. This would have a detrimental impact upon the health of the tree due to the size and amount of pruning wounds created and the subsequent reduction in the photosynthetic capacity of the tree. The amenity value of such a prominent tree would also be adversely affected by the proposed work. 3 ? T28a The proposed works do not provide a suitably detailed level of information required to determine what action will be carried out. British Standard 3998:2010 Tree Work – Recommendations, section 7.7.2 states that a work specification should: 'be accurate and clear, so that the desired result is achieved. To avoid ambiguity, the specified end result can be stated either as the tree-height and branch-spread which are to remain, or the average equivalent in branch length (in metres).' The proposed works do not provide such detail. ? T29 A crown reduction to 5m on the East and West canopy would constitute the removal of a significant amount of canopy. This would have a detrimental impact upon the health of the tree due to the size and amount of pruning wounds created and the subsequent reduction in the photosynthetic capacity of the tree. The amenity value of such a prominent tree would also be adversely affected by the proposed work. ? T30 The proposed work mentions that defective branches are recommended for removal. It is unclear as to what will be removed. It is noted that a natural brace (graft) is present within the crown of the tree and could be seen as a defect. However, removing this natural brace may have a negative impact on the structural integrity of the tree. ? T32 ‘A general light prune’ does not provide a suitably detailed level of information required to determine what action will be carried out. ? T33 ‘A general light prune’ does not provide a suitably detailed level of information required to determine what action will be carried out. ? T34 The proposed work mentions that defective branches are recommended for removal. It is unclear as to what extent (scale) of defect will be removed. Defects can range from small cavities having little significance requiring no remedial work, to large cavities having a detrimental effect on a tree. 4 It is however acknowledged that some works are required so the following lesser works are given consent: Consented lesser works: ? T28 Remove the fire damaged branches on the West side of the canopy. Remove the lowest limb on the East side on the canopy. ? T28a Remove the stem growth only. ? T33 Crown lift the tree to 3m above ground level on the West side of the canopy to clear the memorial headstones. ? T34 Crown lift the tree to 3m above ground level on the West side of the canopy. Conditions: The removed trees must be replaced with newly planted trees. The replacement trees must be planted within 12 months of this letter; and of a size not less than 10-12cm girth when planted. It is recommended that planting takes place between the months of October and February but being careful to avoid periods of waterlogging or hard frost. If the new tree species is different from that removed then Rotherham’s Planning department must be consulted before planting is completed. All tree works shall be carried out in accordance with British Standard 3998: 2010 and shall not exceed the description of applied works. 5 Informatives: Please be aware that the removal of deadwood and detached branches is exempt from normal application procedures. It is advised that an independent assessment of T24, T31 and T32 is carried out to assess their overall condition. Please note the authorised works should be completed within 2 years of the decision notice otherwise a new application for consent to carry out any non-exempt tree work will be required

Click here to return to: Welcome Screen Search Screen Search Results Details Screen